Most Popular Posts
- The “Modern” Lawyer Learner – Overwhelmed, Distracted & Impatient 1,481 views | posted on March 9, 2015
- The End of Work Life Balance 1,055 views | posted on January 26, 2017
- Financial Literacy – No Longer Optional for Lawyers 979 views | posted on August 11, 2014
- The Changing Definition of Value: What Matters Most to In-House Counsel 769 views | posted on September 29, 2014
- Why More of Your Women Lawyers Aren’t Leaders 674 views | posted on August 18, 2014
- Advancement (25)
- Business Strategy (23)
- Career Development (26)
- Career Paths (12)
- Client Value (11)
- Coaching (10)
- Compensation & Benefits (2)
- Diversity & Inclusion (11)
- Engagement (1)
- Leadership (9)
- Orientation & Integration (3)
- Recruitment (4)
- Retention (3)
- Satisfaction & Engagement (8)
- Selection (4)
- Success Traits (6)
- Talent Management (35)
- Training (11)
- Uncategorized (0)
- Work Life Balance (2)
- August 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (2)
- May 2017 (2)
- January 2017 (1)
- December 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (1)
- January 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (1)
- November 2015 (2)
- September 2015 (1)
- August 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (3)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (2)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (1)
- November 2014 (4)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (5)
- August 2014 (10)
- July 2014 (4)
At the Intersection of People and Technology
By Susan Letterman White –
(Initially published by Massachusetts Lawyers Journal March/April 2016; Reprinted with permission)
There have been amazing developments in technology with application to the practice of law. Different technologies collect and measure information, manage processes, remind us of what to do and when to act, and make it much easier and faster to access and organize information. Tech helps manage client relationships, projects, and can even track the patterns of communication within a group for the purpose of improving performance.
For those people who are willing to change the way they think and feel about change in general and about learning new skills, technology improves process efficiency beyond what is humanly possible. They must be willing to change how they think about themselves and their value; their relationships – how people are groups together, connected, and organized; and how they do what they do.
Technology changes a lot of things; but, it does not change human nature.
When technology productizes a service, it replaces a person, whose professional identity was tied to that service and inevitably leads that person to the hard existential questions about identity, value proposition, and personal brand. Consider the effects of Legal Zoom, which has productized many services that a lawyer used to deliver in the community or Ross Intelligence, which is built on IBM’s Watson, and largely replaces the role of legal researcher.
Not only does technology change how we see ourselves and our value; it disrupts our groups and organizational structures by changing how, when, and with whom we connect and interact. It replaces the processes that took us time to learn and master with new processes that require us to take the time to learn new skills. It is human nature to feel a sense of loss with any significant change. It is human nature to feel a sense of disorientation when faced with having to learn how to use new technology. Superimposed on this disruption is the fact that tech’s value proposition and one’s ability to use a piece of tech is intuitive for some people and anti-intuitive for others.
Introducing new technology into a law firm or law department is a significant organizational change. Its success depends on everyone in the organization wanting to use it, learning to use it, and then using it. Resistance comes because we initially interpret change as a loss, regardless of whether it turns out to be full of new opportunities. Resistance also come comes from lawyers, who layer on top of a general dislike of change, a keen skepticism and honed ability to argue against change. For this reason, Tom Mighell, Senior Consultant for Contoural, advises, “pushing technology on anyone is always a mistake if you’re not also telling them why it’s important or why it will help their practice.” He adds, “new technology initiatives are almost never successful unless there is top-down commitment to the project, support for the goals of the technology,” and communication “early, often, and in positive ways about using technology.”
At the intersection of these amazing developments and the people who are expected to use them is an obstacle course at the end of which are new opportunities and benefits. The biggest obstacle, the one that prevents most lawyers from seeing those benefits, so that they can compete at the front of the pack instead of just following the pack, is the way they think and feel.
Obstacles show up as resistance to change, refusing to use the technology or complaining about learning new skills and losing old ways of doing things. Obstacles are marked by feelings of loss, confusion, and skepticism from a psychological perspective. Approaching obstacles with a rational explanation to address irrational feelings is rarely sufficient. When relied on alone, it often backfires and increases skepticism and generalized resistance to change. Details and solution strategies for improving the success rate when introducing new technology fall into three categories: (1) fear; (2) confusion; and (3) not seeing the WIFM factor and being able to answer the question: What’s in it for me?
Fear: People are afraid of failure and being evaluated by others unfavorably. They wonder whether they will be able to learn how to use a piece of technology. Jared Correia, Assistant Director and Senior Law Practice Advisor at LOMAP explains, “many firms are reticent to adopt new technologies because of the learning curve. They don’t take the long view that while an initial decrease in productivity is to be expected, over time, productivity should increase exponentially.” Attorney Dan Siegel, President and Founder of Integrated Technology Services, LLC, tells of another fear that can get in the way of adopting new technology. It’s the fear of what will happen when the organization has a unified database that allows others in the firm to see what they are or are not doing. Andrew Arruda, Co-Founder and CEO of Ross Intelligence has a slightly different take. He says that lawyers aren’t afraid of change as long as you can provide “hands-on proof of the positive outcomes.” For example, he says, “look at the shift in thinking about the risks associated with the cloud versus those associated with life behind a firm’s firewall. Now, it’s unusual for anyone not to recognize that the level of security of a large tech firm is much higher.”
This fear of being judged by others as ineffective, low performers has a work-around. Tackle a problem anchored in a feeling with emotional intelligence, the ability to identify and manage the emotions of self and others. This begins with noticing, naming, and accepting without judgment the feelings that arise.This is followed by managing those feelings. Tips to manage feelings include: (1) giving feelings time to dissipate; (2) building self-confidence to balance out fear through positive self- talk and the power poses suggested by Harvard researcher, Amy Cuddy; and (3) building self-confidence by diving in – using your tenacity to learn something new and gradually building confidence by discovering that you are more capable than you thought.
Confusion: Many people feel confused about specific benefits from a piece of technology and how to use the technology. Correia sees firms refusing to switch to cloud-based products, which come with subscription fees, because firm leaders mistakenly believe that their previously paid, one-time fee for similar technology is sufficient. They do not bring into their analysis the cost to update the technology or the even higher cost on practice performance of not updating it. Arruda suggests tapping into the interest and curiosity that follows closely on the heels of confusion. Ross Intelligence is solving the problem of clients who refuse to pay for legal research. In response to a legal question, Ross will “read through the entire body of law and return a cited answer and topical readings from legislation, case law and secondary sources.” Arruda does more than just talk to a client about what Ross can do, he shows them what they can accomplish. Siegel points out, “there is a great benefit to demonstrating how to use a piece of technology to trigger an ‘aha moment’ and quickly erase any confusion about how to use the technology and what it can do.”
WIFM: Many people don’t see the “what’s in it for me” factor. Leaders are responsible for creating the conditions to address obstacles, including helping others to see the personal benefits. In the 1940s, Alex Bavelas, a psychologist at MIT studying group behavior and change, explained the positive upshot of including the people, who will be affected by change, in the decisions of what changes to make and how to implement them. It’s the best way to let people see the WIFM factor and decide for themselves the degree of personal value. Correia has seen first hand how this plays out when staff are not included in technology decisions. He advises inviting staff “to suggest and test potential products and provide feedback” if you want them to accept the ultimate result.
Leaders can increase chances of success when introducing new technology by first understanding the psychological driving and restraining forces. Managing the psychology of the situation means recognizing that even before people are ready to address fears, clarify confusion, and care about the WIFM factor, they need to feel dissatisfaction with the current situation. The absence of feelings of discomfort and dissatisfaction is a significant restraining force. Managing the psychology of the situation also means that while people are addressing fears, clarifying confusion, and thinking about their WIFM factor, they must harbor the belief that their efforts will be successful and lead to the personal and organizational goals for the technology. Using emotional and social intelligence, a leaders can change the way others feel and what they believe about using new technology.
Leaders manage the psychology of the situation by:
- Acknowledging that the feelings of fear, loss, and confusion are normal reactions;
- Creating personal discomfort with reminders of the risks of not using new tech;
- Demonstrating, by example, the behavior they want to see in others;
- Creating incentives that encourage people to try out a technology and share their experiences with others;
- Reminding everyone that they are capable of facing the challenge successfully and attaining personal goals and contributing to the attainment of organizational goals; and
- Answering the WIFM question on each individual’s mind and explaining the competitive edge they personally.
Correia recommends leaders “actually use the technology themselves to set a good example” and also to “identify persons within the firm who can be superstar tech users and teach others how to use it.” Siegel suggests reminding people to “just look around and watch as the least techie people, or the most resistant to change, are the ones who generally are shown the door first.” Planning your strategy to manage the psychology of resistance that frequently blocks the intersection of people and technology is the first step in paving a road to success.
Susan Letterman White is a consultant for professional service firm leaders, who want to design, implement, and manage customized, organization-wide, strategic change projects to create sustainable and substantial performance improvements. Her work aligns leadership, culture, and competency modeling with performance goal outcomes of: (1) business development, retention, and growth and (2) the engagement, development, advancement, and retention of exceptional people. She gets people to change their thinking and behavior by looking at data about themselves and their organizational context.
Susan was an employment law litigator and trusted adviser to her clients for more than 20 years and a managing partner of a law firm before she began her Master of Science studies in Organization Development. In 2008, She was awarded her M.S. degree with Academic Distinction from American University. She is certified to administer competency, culture, and personality assessment tools, interpret results, coach and consult using:
- Korn/Ferry Leadership Architect®
- Korn/Ferry Voices®
- Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI®)
- Thomas Kilmann Inventory (TKI)
- Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI)
- Organization Network Mapping
She also has received advanced training in group dynamics and facilitation from NTL Institute and is certified as a mediator.
Susan is a frequent speaker at national and local conferences (ABA 2012-2014, LMA 2013, ALA -Boston Chapter 2014, MBA 2013-2014, NAWL 2011, WLALA 2011 and 2012) and in law schools (University of Maryland Law School, Northeastern University School of Law, University of Tulsa Law School, and St. Thomas University School of Law). She is alsoa past chair of the ABA Women Rainmakers (2011-2013), a member of ABA Law Practice Division Counsel (2012- present), a member of the Massachusetts Bar Law Practice Management Committee (2013 – present), and a member of the Boston Bar Association Diversity and Inclusion Committee (2013- present). She has delivered trainings and workshops onculture change, leadership, team building, diversity and inclusion, organization dynamics and networks, relationship building, strategic communication, and client engagement for law firms, non-profit organizations, and Fortune 500 companies.
Susan is the author of Power and Influence for Lawyers: How to Use it to Develop Business and Advance your Career (Thomson-Reuters/West Publishing 2011) and many articles for national and local publications. She is working on her second book, which is on the topic of strategic organizational change, is an adjunct faculty member at Northeastern University, is certified in e-Learning, serves as an arbitrator and mediator for workplace disputes. Susan is located in Boston, MA.